Boeing-Case Study Essay Example for Free

Boeing-Case Study Essay The key elements of the resistance to change described in the Perrier case are: Lack of communication and the companies inability to inform the employees of what changes affected production at Perrier, the company made excessive changes, the company introduces a series of changes and the people felt the changes were unnecessary, and they were unsure if they would still have the required skills to continue to work for the company. Perrier has made quite a fair amount of changes in a short period of time and they will need to be aware that some people may not agree to the change and might not work to their full potential. Most of Perriers employees did not think the changes were necessary for the organization to grow. There were some employees who thought Perriers conducted unnecessary changes to impact their normal workload. The latter change was considered as the lack of conviction that change is needed. There was also the Perceived Negative Effect on Interest -this resistance to change will be affected by peoples perceptions of the likely effect of the change on their interests, a term that can cover a wide range of factors including their authority, status, rewards(including salary), opportunity to apply expertise, membership of friendship networks, autonomy, and security. The employees at Perrier were concerned with the implication of the change for themselves and how it may affect their own interests, rather than considering effects for the success of the business. 2. Construct a change management strategy for dealing with this situation. In so doing, identify what approach (es) to managing resistance you recommend and provide a clear justification for your choice. An article by Kotter and Schlesinger provides the classic description on managing the resista

Janies Search for Identity in Their Eyes Were Watching God :: Their Eyes Were Watching God Essays

Janie's Search for Identity in Their Eyes Were Watching God In the novel, Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston, there are many lessons on a person's search for identity. Janie's search for identity throughout this book is very visible. It has to do with her search for a name, and freedom for herself. As she goes through life her search takes many turns for the worse and a few for the better, but in the end she finds her true identity. Through her marriages with Logan, Joe, then Tea Cake she figures out what is for her and how she wants to live. So in the end, she is where she wants to be. In Janie's early life she lived with her grandmother, Nanny. Nanny and Janie were pretty well off and had the privilege to live in the yard of white folks. While Janie was growing up she played with the white children.­ While she was in this stage, she was faced with much criticism and was called many names, so many that everyone started calling her alphabet, "'cause so many people had done named me different names." Soon she started piecing together what she knew of her odd identity. Then one day she saw herself in a photograph and noticed that she looked different, that she had dark skin, and she said, "before Ah seen de picture Ah thought Ah wuz just like de rest." From this point, Janie fell into somewhat of a downward spiral, setting her off of the path toward finding her own identity in society. Finally when she was older Nanny saw her doing somethings under the pear tree that she thought were unacceptable. Nanny quickly arranged a marriage between Janie and a well-off local man, Logan Killicks. In this marriage Janie resisted. She felt as if she was losing her freedom was well as her identity, she wasn't Janie anymore she was now Mrs. Logan Killicks, and she was somewhat obligated to do what he wanted. Not long into this marriage, Janie has had enough, and when the chance to go away with a smooth, romantic man, she takes the chance. The man Janie left Logan for was named Joe Starks. Joe was a smart man who started his own town, Eatonville. In the beginning of her relationship with, Joe, she felt loved, something she never really felt while she had been with Logan. At first, when she ran away with Joe, she felt as if she was finding her new identity, but all there was for her to find was a great maze not always

Men and Women in Society

Well obviously, men and women are different. In society however men and women play very different roles. Used to be, men were looked at as the dominant one in a relationship and society. Now a day women are becoming dominant in more ways than one. For example, in the job world, government, relationships, freedom, and sex are just some of the categories that women have risen in, in society. More women are in positions of power and authority.Even though, because of the past, men and women will never be treated the same, in society mostly men and women are treated fairly equal. There is little to no discrimination in the job field or the government against women in society. Men are still usually looked at as a higher class than women but that is just because of the past events that have happened in society. The world is becoming an all-around equal place. The history of women in the American labor force has been shaped by diverse cultural, legal, demographic, and ethno-racial influences .Like men, women in preindustrial America contributed to their household and community economies through paid and unpaid labor, but the material rewards of their labor were limited by cultural beliefs, social practices, and laws that subordinated women to men. Except by special legal arrangement, married women could not sign labor contracts, own property, or claim their own wages. Some women did work for wages, but those who did, even unmarried women and widows, clustered in lower-paying occupations and earned lower wages than men.Initially, these conditions were reproduced, and even accentuated, as the industrial economy developed. As families became more dependent on cash for survival, free women (as well as free men) increased their participation in the paid labor force. Especially numerous as seamstresses in the needle trades and in domestic work, women were also essential to the emerging factories. Other women worked as members of â€Å"family† production units (in shoem aking or retail shops, for example) and as homeworkers in textiles, shoes, or other products–patterns of work that still persist.Laws granting married women legal rights to their wages and to property became common only in the late nineteenth century. The growing identification of men as â€Å"breadwinners† and the rise of an urban middle class (with its status-conscious emphasis on the â€Å"lady of leisure†) further reinforced the tendency to view women as secondary wage-earners, regardless of their actual contributions to family survival. From the late nineteenth century onward, U. S. -born white women enjoyed steadily expanding access to nonagricultural and nonindustrial occupations. They increasingly found jobs as office clerks and secretaries and in retailing.Benefiting from expanded educational opportunities, white, middle-class women in the late nineteenth century entered the professions in growing numbers, initially as teachers, librarians, social worke rs, and nurses, and later in a variety of career paths, from firefighting and police work to the law, medicine, the ministry, higher education, and in the corporate world. Historically, patterns of participation in the paid labor force have varied dramatically by marital status as well as by ethnicity and nativity. â€Å"Until the 1930s, most wage-earning women were unmarried.As late as 1960, only one-third of married women were gainfully employed–a figure that obscures a common pattern of irregular yet continuing labor-force participation. Only in the late twentieth century did that pattern decisively shift. In 1997, 61. 3 percent of married women were in the labor force† (Boydston). Although only in the late twentieth century did most labor unions show an interest in organizing female workers, women in the paid labor force long constituted an aggressive force for reform. In the government of the U. S. women, such as Hilary Clinton, are just as strong and knowledgeabl e as men.Women have run for president, there has been a woman as secretary of state, as have many other women who have been incorporated into the government staff. Men have always been involved in the government. The obvious facts of this are all of the male presidents that have been in office, there has never been a female president, not to say that there never will be. There will be, one day, a women in office running the United States. â€Å"In the 1995 World Conference on Women, 189 governments committed to â€Å"ensure women’s equal access to and full participation in power structures and decision-making. To fulfill this strategic objective, governments also pledged to establish the goal of â€Å"gender balance in governmental bodies and committees as well as in public administrative entities and in the judiciary. † Six years later, not much has changed – women’s representation in politics remains dismally low. †(UNDP 2). â€Å"Today women a re only 13. 7 percent of parliaments worldwide according to data collected by the Inter-Parliamentary Union, a mere 0. 6 percent increase annually. In the Asia Pacific, women are 14. 2 percent of national parliaments† (UNDP 1).At this rate, it will take 75 years before women attain equal representation in national governments. At the local level, the situation is no different – women make up a small percentage of legislative councils and other local bodies in most countries in the world. Only Sweden, Denmark and Finland in Europe have reached a critical mass of 30 percent women in local governments, while South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago come close at 28 and 23 percent respectively. In the Asia Pacific, women’s representation in local governments has ranged from a low two percent to a high 30 percent (e. . India, Bangladesh and New Zealand)(UNDP 2-3). Even though women are told that they are equal in the government, according to the facts, they really are not . There are the obvious difference about men and women and sex, but men and women have different characteristics when it comes to sex. It probably won't surprise you to learn that researchers have found that men tend to initiate sex more frequently than do women. Researchers have also found that men tend to be more â€Å"goal oriented,† to consider the act of sex, especially orgasm, to be what love making is all about.Women, in contrast, tend to focus more on tenderness and the quality of their emotional relationship. Keep in mind that generalizations about human behavior, although true in the abstract, do not apply to individuals. Most men and women apparently have different emphases on sexual intercourse and emotional relationships, but any particular individual may vary from this tendency. A particular man, for example, may be more oriented toward intimacy, a particular woman toward having sex. Generalizations, then, can lead to stereotypes that paint everyone with the sam e broad brushstroke, causing us to overlook individual differences.One of the ways our culture inhibits women's sexuality is through stereotypes. A sexually promiscuous man is often looked up to by his friends. He is seen as a success in sexual matters, a conqueror, a sexual victor. In contrast, a woman who has many sexual partners is not as likely to be viewed in the same way. Questions are likely to be raised about why she is â€Å"like that. † People may refer to her by negative terms, such as whore. Although this double standard of stereotypes is easing, it persists. When it comes to virginity men and women typically re viewed different. Women expressed more positive feelings about their decision, and they were more apt to say they were proud or satisfied with their virginity. Men, in contrast, were more apt to say they felt embarrassed or even guilty about their virginity. The reason for this difference in attitude about virginity is likely due to gender roles, to differ ences about what is expected of men and women. There appears to be a general idea that if a woman is a virgin, she is one by choice, but if a man is a virgin, he has problems of some sort.It seems that a woman can wait for the right person, or for marriage, but a man ought to be seeking sex–and the more sex he has, the manlier he is. In short, being a virgin may challenge a man's masculinity, but not a woman's femininity. In relationships between men and women some say that men and women can just be friends. They way men chose their friends is not just my the female’s personality. A man choses his female friends by how attracted he is to them. Even if it is just a small attraction, its still there. A man isn’t going to initiate friendship with someone he deems â€Å"ugly†, or â€Å"unattractive†.The same goes for women. So, in essence men and women cannot just be friends. There is always something more there to tempt either the man or the women, wh ether he/she is in another relationship or not, to have some kind of whether it be physical or emotional connection with that â€Å"friend†. When polled, 58% said yes , and 42% said no men and women cannot just be friends ( Friends). So really there are no definite answers to this question. Throughout history, women's rights have been the subject of much debate and controversy.The concept of a woman's ‘right' can take a variety of forms including voting, reproductive control, equality in the workplace and service in the military. In most societies the women's movement has faced opposition and equality has been hard won. Equal rights campaigners have championed the movement with the goal of establishing fair and comparable treatment for women under law. â€Å"Evidence dating from around 8500 B. C suggests that in Ancient Egyptian society's work was divided along gender lines with the women assuming agricultural duties and the men taking on the role of hunter/gathererâ⠂¬  (sampson).Progress has been made over the decades, but there is still debate over some aspects of women's rights and the extent to which they have effectively redressed the prior imbalance. In a 2009 report published by the Department of Labor, it is stated that on average women earn approximately 80 percent of the salary a man is paid for the same job. Whilst this is an improvement from 30 years before, when a woman earned 62 percent of a man's salary, it does still not represent full parity.Reproductive rights are also a contested issue with opinions divided on whether abortion should remain legal. †In a 2009 poll by CBS news, 23 percent of respondents believed abortion should be illegal versus 34 percent fully supportive of abortion without constraint, and 40 percent in favor of keeping the practice legal but with stricter controls† (Sampson). Even though women have rose in society there is always that barrier that was created long ago restricting some peopleâ₠¬â„¢s views of women’s’ freedom and power in society. Men and women also tend to handle different situations differently.Perhaps if something breaks, the woman is more apt to be calm about the situation when the man is more apt to have a complete melt down about the situation. When an argument happens and the man is wrong he backs down, when a woman is wrong she back tracks her point and somehow proves the man wrong, or so he thinks. When women are right they don’t boast or â€Å"rub it in† so to speak. When men are right they are the first ones to say â€Å"I told you so†. Are women naturally more risk-averse or less inclined to enter a competitive situation? Or are they trained to be that way?Why women and men might have different preferences or risk attitudes has been discussed but not tested by economists. Broadly speaking, those differences may be due to nurture, nature, or some combination of the two. For instance, boys are pushed to take ris ks and act competitively when participating in sports, and girls are often encouraged to remain cautious. Thus, the choices made by men could be due to the nurturing received from parents or peers. Similarly, the disinclination of women to take risks or act competitively could be the result of parental or peer pressure not to do so. Educational psychologists argue that the gendered aspect of individuals' behaviour is brought into play by the gender of others with whom they interact, and that there may be more pressure for girls to maintain their gender identity in schools where boys are present than for boys when girls are present. In a coeducational environment, girls are more explicitly confronted with adolescent subculture (such as personal attractiveness to members of the opposite sex) than they are in a single-sex environment. This may lead them to conform to society's expectations of how girls should behave to avoid social rejection. †( Booth).If competitive behaviour or risk avoidance is viewed as being a part of female gender identity, while risk-seeking is a part of male gender identity, then a coeducational school environment might lead girls to make less competitive and risky choices than boys. It is hypothesized that hypothesized that woman and men may differ in their propensity to choose a risky outcome for several reasons – innate references or because their innate preferences are modified by pressure to conform to gender-stereotypes. Single-sex environments are likely to modify students' risk-taking preferences in economically important ways.Our specific conjectures were that girls from single-sex schools are less risk averse than girls from coed schools, and that girls in same-gender groups are less risk averse than girls in coed groups. It has been conjectured that girls in same-gender environments (single-sex schooling or same-gender experimental groups) are no less risk-averse than boys. Naturally it is assumed that women are le ss risky than boys this is because the women always feels like she has to be the protector and if she is taking risks she is not able to protect the ones taking risks.

REGISTRATION OF A FIRM - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2454 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Review Did you like this example? REGISTRATION AND DISSOLUTION OF A FIRM In this Unit, we will understand the effect of registration of a firm upon the rights of partnersà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ inter-se and the rights of the third parties. We will also be looking at the various circumstances when a firm is dissolved and the consequences and the effect of the dissolution upon rights and liabilities of various parties. We will be covering the following key parameters: Mode of effecting registration Consequences of non registration Dissolution of firm Consequences and the effect of dissolution Mode of giving public notice Title Question à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Registration of a firm Registration means getting the partnership registered with the Registrar of the firm of the area in which the place of business of the firm is situated or proposed to be situated. Chapter VII of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 deals with registration of firms. Sections 56-71 contain different provisions regarding registration of firms. The registration of a firm may be effected at any time by sending by post or delivering to the Registrar of the area in which any place of business of the firm is situated or proposed to be situated, a statement in the prescribed form and accompanied by the prescribed fee (Section 58) stating,à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬  (a) the firm name, (b) the place or principal place of business of the firm, (c) the names of any other places where the firm carries on business, (d) the date when each partner joined the firm, (e) the names in full and permanent addresses of the partners, and (f) the duration of the firm. The statement shall be signe d by all the partners, or by their agents specially authorised in this behalf. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "REGISTRATION OF A FIRM" essay for you Create order Question 1 à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" How do we know when the Registration process is completed? Registration of a firm is complete when: a) An application in the prescribed form with the prescribed fee and necessary details is delivered to the Registrar b) The Registrar given an acknowledgement of receipt of application c) The Registrar gives it final certificate of Registration d) A period of one month lapses after the application as in a) above is submitted to the Registrar However, Registration is deemed to be complete as soon as an application in prescribed form with prescribed fees and necessary details concerning the particular of partnership is delivered to the Registrar. Example-ABC a partnership firm was constituted on 01.04.2015. On 25th April the partners resolved to get the firm registered with the Registrar of firm. The firm prepared the necessary documents for Registration on 26th April which was signed on 28th April. They sent the documents to the Registrar office on 30th April by registered post which was received in the Registrar office on 4th May 2015. The firm will thus be deemed to have been registered on 30th April. Question 2 à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" What if the Registration process is not completed? Section 69 of the Act which deals with the effects of non-registration denies certain rights to an unregistered firm. Under the Act:-  · A partner of an unregistered firm cannot file a suit in any court against the firm or other partners for the enforcement of any right arising from a contract or right conferred by the Partnership Act unless the firm is registered and the person suing is or has been shown in the Register of Firms as a partner in the firm. For example- If a partner of an unregistered firm is not paid his share of profits, he cannot claim it from the court.  · No suits to enforce a right arising from a contract shall be instituted in any Court by or on behalf of a firm against any third party unless the firm is registered and the persons suing are or have been shown in the Register of Firms as partners in the firm. For example- If an unregistered firm has sold some goods to the customer, it cannot file a suit against the customer for the recovery of the price of goods. On the other hand, if any unregistered firm has purchased some goods from a supplier, such supplier can file a suit against the firm for the recovery of the price of goods.  · An unregistered firm or any of its partners cannot claim a set off (i.e. mutual adjustment of debts owned by the disputant parties to one another) or other proceedings in a dispute with a third. For example-If an unregistered firm owes Rs. 10,000 to A, a third party A owes Rs. 1,000 to the firm, A files a suit against the firm for recovery of Rs.10,000. In this case an unregistered firm cannot say that Rs.1,000 should be adjusted against Rs.10,000. Non-registration of a Partnership firm shall not affect: The rights of third parties to sue the firm and/or its partners. The firms or partners in the firms which have no place of business in the territories to which this Act extends, or whose places of business in the said territories are situated in areas to which the act does not apply. any suit or claim or set-off not exceeding Rs. 100 in value which, in the Presidency towns, is not of a kind specified in Section 19 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 (15 of 1882), or outside the Presidency- towns, is not of a kind specified in the Second Schedule to the Provincial small Cause Courts Act, 1887 (9 of 1887), to any proceeding in execution or other proceeding incidental to or arising from any such suit or claim. the enforcement of any right to sue for the dissolution of a firm or for accounts of a dissolved firm, or any right or power to realise the property of a dissolved firm. the powers of an official assignee, receiver or Court under the Presidency-towns Insolvency Act, 1909 (3 of 1909), or the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (5 of 1920), to realise the property of an insolvent partner. Example- A and B purchased a taxi and they were plying it in partnership. The firm was not registered. After 1 year, A sold the taxi without Bà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s consent and did not pay anything to B. B filed a suit against A to recover his share in the sale proceeds. A defended the suit on the basis that the firm was not registered. It was held that the suit was maintainable because it was for the realisation of the assets of a dissolved firm. Thought Provoking Question à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Is the Registration of firm compulsory? No, Registration of firms is not compulsory. Partnership Act, 1932 does not provide for compulsory registration of firms. It is optional for partners to set the firm registered and there are no penalties for non-registration. Conclusion Thus we conclude that the Partnership Act, 1932 does not make registration of a firm compulsory. It is optional. But it introduces certain disabilities which makes registration necessary at one time or other. Also the law has not provided anytime for registration of firm. It is possible at any time. An unregistered firm is not an illegal association. Title Question à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Dissolution of a firm Sonu and Monu were very good friends. They were running a business as a partnership firm. They were very successful. People were jealous of their relations. But one day people came to know that they have closed the business. Some dispute had arisen between the two on a trivial issue. Similarly, firm may come to an end because of dispute among the partners or firm running losses for last few years or because of order of the court and so on. We can say that the partnership firm is dissolved. According to Section 39 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, the dissolution of partnership between all partners of a firm is called dissolution of the firm. Thus the Dissolution of firm means the discontinuation of the jural relation existing between all the partners of the firm. Question 1 à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" What are the modes of dissolution of firm? The dissolution of partnership may be in any of the following ways: 1. Dissolution without the order of the court or voluntary dissolu tion [Section 40-43]: a) By mutual agreement (Section 40) A firm may be dissolved by mutual agreement between/among partners. Even a firm for a fixed duration may be dissolved by mutual agreement b) Compulsory dissolution (Section 41) In the following cases, a firm is compulsorily dissolved: If all partners, or all the partners except one partner of the firm are declared insolvent, or If some event take place which make it UNLAWFUL for the firmà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s business to be carried on. c) On happening of certain contingencies (Section 42) In the absence of any provision to the contrary in the partnership agreement, in the following four cases the firm will automatically be dissolved: On the expiry of the fixed term for which the firm was constituted, On the completion of venture or undertaking for which the firm was constituted, On the death of a partner, On the insolvency of a partner d) By notice of partnership at will (Section 43) Where the partnership is at will, the firm may be dissolved by any partner by giving notice in writing to all other partners of his intention of dissolving a firm. Acceptance of notice is not required. Notice once given cannot be withdrawn without the consent of all other partners 2. Dissolution by the court [Section 44] The right of a partner to file a suit for dissolution on any of the ground cannot be excluded by any agreement. a) Insanity/unsound mind If a partner (not a sleeping partner) has become of unsound mind, then court may allow dissolution of firm on a petition made by any other partner or legal representative of the insane partner. Temporary sickness is no ground for dissolution of firm. b) Permanent incapacity When a partner (not a sleeping partner) has become permanently incapable of performing of his duties as a partner, then court may allow dissolution of firm on a petition made by any other par tner. Such permanent incapacity may result from physical disability or illness etc. Example- Partner becomes blind or is paralyzed due to polio. c) Misconduct (Section 45) When any partner is guilty of any misconduct which is likely to adversely affect the carrying on of the business, the court may allow dissolution of firm on the petition made by any other partner. It is not necessary that misconduct must relate to the conduct of the business. The important point is the adverse effect of misconduct on the business. In each case nature of business will decide whether an act is misconduct or not. Example- Travelling on railway by a partner without ticket. d) Persistent breach of agreement When a partner willfully or persistently commits breach of agreement with regard to matters relating to the business of the firm, any other partner may apply to the court for dissolution of the firm. Following comes in to category of breach of contract: Embezzlement, Keeping erroneous accounts Holding more cash than allowed Refusal to show accounts despite repeated request etc. e) Transfer of interest When a partner has transferred the whole of his interest in the firm to a third party, then any other partner may apply to court for dissolution of firm. f) Continuous losses Where the business cannot be carried on except at a loss, any partner may apply to court for dissolution of court. g) Just and equitable grounds Where the court is satisfied that it is just and equitable to dissolve the firm, it may allow dissolution using it discretionary power. For example: Continued quarrel between partners Refusal to meet on matters of business Complete deadlock in management due to partners not on speaking terms Lack of confidence and good faith among partners, etc Question 2 à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å"What are the consequences of dissolution? Consequent to the dissolution of a partnership firm, the partners have certain rights and liabilities, as are discussed: (a) Continuing liability until public notice- Inspite of dissolution of the firm, partners continue to be liable for any act done by any of them, which would have been an act of the firm if done before the dissolution, until public notice is given of the dissolution. (b) Rights to enforce winding up- On dissolution of partnership, any partner or his representative shall have right, against other partners à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" To have property of the firm applied in payment of the debts of the firm and To have the surplus distributed among the partners or their representatives according to their respective rights. (c) Authority of partners after dissolution- The authority of a partner to bind the firm other mutual rights and obligations continue- Which are necessary to wind up the firm. To complete the unfinished transactions pending at the date of dissolution. (d) Settlement of Partnership A/cà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s- i. Losses including deficiencies of capital are to be paid à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" (I) Out of profits, then (II) Out of capital, then (III) By partners individually in their profit sharing ratio ii. Assets of the firm + Contributions by partners on A/c of deficiencies of capital must be applied in following order:à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" (i) To pay debts of outsiders then (ii) To pay partnerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s loan then (iii) To pay partnerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s capital then (iv) Balance will be shared in profit sharing ratio (e) Personal profits earned after dissolution- and till the firm is wound up, partners must A/c for, the profits from carrying on business of the firm, to the other partners. (f) Return of premium on partnershipà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s premature dissolution (Section 51)- In case of dissolution of partnership earlier than the period fixed for it, the partner paying premium is entitled to return of the premium as such part thereof as may be reasonable, regard being had to the terms of agreement to the length of time during which he was a partner, except when partnership is dissolved:à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Due to death of one of the partners or Mainly due to misconduct of the partner paying the premium or Pursuant to an agreement containing no provisions for the return of the premium or any part thereof. Conclusion Thus we conclude that Dissolution of a firm means the breaking up or extinction of the relationship which subsisted between all the partners of the firm under various circumstances contemplated by Act. A partnership can be dissolved only in accordance with the manner prescribed under the Act. Title Question à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Mode of Giving Public Notice In every case where public notice of any manner in respect of partnership firm is required to be given under this act, it must be given By notification in the official Gazette, and In at least one vernacular (local language) newspaper circulating n the district where the firm to which it relates has its place or principal place of business. In case of registered firms, in addition to above notification, a notice is also required to be served on the Registrar of firms.